Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Gulls on the Thames

  1. #1
    Regular Member maximumexposure's Avatar
    Real Name
    Paul
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Silchester
    Posts
    201
    Cameras and Equipment

    Nikon D90 and a Raynox DCR 250 and Nikon18-105mm vr , 70-300mm lense and Sigma 150-500mm lens

    Default Gulls on the Thames

    This was taken on the Thames in Henley on Thames the other weekend. There were so many of them around taking bread off the water, made for some great action shots
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Gulls on the river2.jpg 
Views:	321 
Size:	621.9 KB 
ID:	11590  

  2. #2
    Administrator rolf's Avatar
    Real Name
    Rolf
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Tilehurst, Berkshire
    Posts
    11,264
    Cameras and Equipment

    Olympus E-30, Sigma 50-500mm Lens, Sigma 150mm Macro lens, Zuiko 70-300mm lens, Sigma 50mm F1,4 lens, Extension tube, 1.4x tele-converter, Carbon FibreTripod, Monopod, Vanguard Binoculars, Celestron 80F-ED Scope, Remembird recorder.

    Default

    Nice one Paul, was that using RAW as well?
    Rolf

  3. #3
    Regular Member maximumexposure's Avatar
    Real Name
    Paul
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Silchester
    Posts
    201
    Cameras and Equipment

    Nikon D90 and a Raynox DCR 250 and Nikon18-105mm vr , 70-300mm lense and Sigma 150-500mm lens

    Default

    Thanks Rolf,

    It was indeed, I still need to work out how to use the free software to make the most of it. These are the first pictures I have ever shot in Raw, so still learning

  4. #4
    Slightly Mad Moderator ladylouise62's Avatar
    Real Name
    Louise
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Reading, Berks (England)
    Posts
    4,209
    Cameras and Equipment

    Olympus Evolt E520, and borrowed lenses and flash. Fuji Finepix S7000 for Macro A chair :)

    Default

    Lovely shot, I like it. I have dabbled with RAW, but I couldn't see what difference it made to the processing - it didn't seem any better than from JPEG... so I need to read up on it first

  5. #5
    Administrator rolf's Avatar
    Real Name
    Rolf
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Tilehurst, Berkshire
    Posts
    11,264
    Cameras and Equipment

    Olympus E-30, Sigma 50-500mm Lens, Sigma 150mm Macro lens, Zuiko 70-300mm lens, Sigma 50mm F1,4 lens, Extension tube, 1.4x tele-converter, Carbon FibreTripod, Monopod, Vanguard Binoculars, Celestron 80F-ED Scope, Remembird recorder.

    Default

    I think it really comes into its own when shooting dark colours, like a Crow or black Labrador, it certainly has brought out the contrasts in the water.
    Rolf

  6. #6
    Regular Member maximumexposure's Avatar
    Real Name
    Paul
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Silchester
    Posts
    201
    Cameras and Equipment

    Nikon D90 and a Raynox DCR 250 and Nikon18-105mm vr , 70-300mm lense and Sigma 150-500mm lens

    Default

    Very True Rolf, Just have to learn the software now.

  7. #7
    Regular Member digidark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Darlington
    Posts
    1,451
    Cameras and Equipment

    Canon 300D Panasonic FZ50 CS2 Lightroom

    Default

    A jpeg file has already been part processed in camera by a variety of presets. A RAW file is just that, exactly what was captured at the time of taking the shot. Nothing added and nothing taken away. In most cases a jpeg is fine, its when conditions are not "average" that RAW comes into its own.

    I hope this helps explain.
    IF TIN WHISTLES ARE MADE OF TIN

    WHAT DO THEY MAKE FOGHORNS OUT OF?


  8. #8
    Founder Member Chocky's Avatar
    Real Name
    Beryl
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Exmouth
    Posts
    17,488
    Cameras and Equipment

    Nikon D7200 Camera. Nikon 55-300mm VR F4.5-5.6G ED AF-S DX NIKKOR SWM WAF-5 DX Micro Nikkor 40mmf/2.8G SWM DX swm ED af aspherical 18-55 With wide angle converter Nikon Coolpix S5100 Sony HandycamDCR-SR58 Hama tripod Canon Pixma iP7250 PixmaMG5500

    Default

    Exellent capture

    There ia a didfference with RAW. I found it a much better photo. Unfortunatly my camera doesn't work fast enough for action shots in RAW so I went back to fine.

  9. #9
    Regular Member Sydney2's Avatar
    Real Name
    Alan
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Basingstoke
    Posts
    161
    Cameras and Equipment

    Sony A700 Sony 70-400 Sony 18-250 Sony 100mm 2.8 macro Sony 50mm 1.4 Kenko 1.4 converter

    Default

    I agree RAW slows down the Frames Per second. I only use RAW fror cetain photos.
    Alan

  10. #10
    Founder Member Chocky's Avatar
    Real Name
    Beryl
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Exmouth
    Posts
    17,488
    Cameras and Equipment

    Nikon D7200 Camera. Nikon 55-300mm VR F4.5-5.6G ED AF-S DX NIKKOR SWM WAF-5 DX Micro Nikkor 40mmf/2.8G SWM DX swm ED af aspherical 18-55 With wide angle converter Nikon Coolpix S5100 Sony HandycamDCR-SR58 Hama tripod Canon Pixma iP7250 PixmaMG5500

    Default

    I had my Camera set on RAW and Fine and both come out side by side that is how I found such detale in RAW.
    Then I set it to RAW and yes my camera can't do action in RAW. Some cameras can

  11. #11
    Regular Member maximumexposure's Avatar
    Real Name
    Paul
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Silchester
    Posts
    201
    Cameras and Equipment

    Nikon D90 and a Raynox DCR 250 and Nikon18-105mm vr , 70-300mm lense and Sigma 150-500mm lens

    Default

    Thanks for the comments and about Raw.

    I have not noticed much of a difference with The d90 taking action shots in Raw compared to JPEG. Will have to do a little test.

  12. #12
    Regular Member digidark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Darlington
    Posts
    1,451
    Cameras and Equipment

    Canon 300D Panasonic FZ50 CS2 Lightroom

    Default

    I am into landscape photography more than bird photography, although I enjoy the bird photography very much. I will sit for hours to get the right light for a landscape, RAW is fine for that, you just can't do that with birds or any other creature. Unless you can afford to buy the latest pro digital camera with all its long range lenses. (That's the same as four people travelling around the world, first class or a couple of Ferrari's)...............stick to jpeg for birds and all the other furry things. It works a lot faster on most cameras, make that on all cameras including the Pro stuff
    Last edited by digidark; 22-10-2009 at 05:35 PM.
    IF TIN WHISTLES ARE MADE OF TIN

    WHAT DO THEY MAKE FOGHORNS OUT OF?


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Gulls
    By WD-40 in forum Wildlife News feeds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-09-2012, 05:12 AM
  2. ID Needed Gulls
    By ladylouise62 in forum Identification requests on birds, wildlife and plants
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-08-2010, 06:47 PM
  3. Gulls
    By maximumexposure in forum Birds in Flight
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 13-07-2009, 01:52 PM
  4. Herring Gulls in flight - Thames, London
    By ladylouise62 in forum Aquatic Birds, Water Fowl and Seabirds
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-06-2007, 11:37 PM
  5. Young Herring Gulls - Thames, London Southbank
    By ladylouise62 in forum Aquatic Birds, Water Fowl and Seabirds
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-06-2007, 09:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Copyright of members' images remains with the individual member and these images may not be reproduced or downloaded without their written permission.
If you cannot contact the relevant member for permission, please contact Thames Valley Birds and we will pass on your request.

pets and plants

WYW
Birding Top 500 Counter RSPB - Nature's Voice
The Admin Zone Directory of Forums


Top Lists